On the endogenous nature of economic data (now that’s what I call an attention-grabbing headline!)

Nancy Folbre, an economics professor at UMass Amherst, e-mails with a couple good criticisms of my “Don’t Ditch the GDP” column:

First, no economist that I know of, either on or off the Sarkozy Commission, has advocated ditching GDP. What’s under discussion is the possibility of developing good supplements to it.

Second, the viability of economic accounting measures is not completely determined by the ability of existing data. Once we decide something is important, we can figure out how measure it. Data are (at least partially) endogenous!

The first point is right–it’s the non-economists (such as Sarkozy) who speak of actually replacing GDP. And as for the second, well, this is why we need to Save the American Time Use Survey!

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Associated Press

    Apple CEO Cook Gives Up $75M in Stock Dividends

    NEW YORK — Apple CEO Tim Cook is giving up $75 million in dividends on restricted stock that the company is awarding to all of its employees.

    In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, Apple Inc. said that Cook requested that his restricted stock units not receive dividends. The dividends that Apple workers are getting amount to $2.65 per quarter for each restricted stock unit held. The shares are not normally eligible to receive dividends, so Apple’s decision is a perk for its employees.

    The Bomb Hidden in Mitt Romney's Education PlanSlate

    Associated Press

    Study: Typical CEO Pay Up 6% to $9.6 Million

    NEW YORK — Profits at big U.S. companies broke records last year, and so did pay for CEOs.

    The head of a typical public company made $9.6 million in 2011, according to an analysis by The Associated Press using data from Equilar, an executive pay research firm.

  • Scott Gibson

    Call me a data nerd, but I think there’s way too much emotional hot air out there with little to back it up. I’d like to see a lot more data-driven opinions getting attention. To that end, I’ve created some interesting charts to make it easier to get one’s mind wrapped around some of our government’s statistics:

    http://www.supportingevidence.com/Government/government_landing.html

    For example, check out the ranked bar chart on U.S. Federal Government Budget by Agency. How can we be concerned with ‘wasting’ money on NASA, the EPA, or DoE, when these things are dwarfed by agencies like Health and Human Services, Social Security, Defense, and Treasury. Just get 10% more efficient in these huge bureaucracies and fund free homes for the masses or colonies on Mars!

    Scott Gibson
    http://www.supportingevidence.com
    ‘worth a thousand words’

blog comments powered by Disqus