How Canada is the answer to American indebtedness

Thanks, Justin! And what a warm welcome from That Anonymous Dude. I feel at home already. Though I do feel the need to point out that I know more about taxation in northern Europe than you have been led to believe. I once wrote an entire sentence on the topic.

So, today I’d like to talk about a story you’ve probably never heard anything about. Americans, it seems, have a little problem with debt. We do like our Humvees and big-plate dinners, don’t we? And those credit card companies are so evil, aren’t they, always pushing more borrowed money down our throats?

Well, as Stuart Vyse, a professor of psychology at Connecticut College, points out in his new book, Going Broke: Why Americans Can’t Hold On To Their Money, those are both ways to look at the facts through a moral lens. Either business is to blame, or consumers are. When you instead look at the problem through a factual lens, neither explanation completely holds up.

Vyse has two really cool charts showing the number of personal bankruptcies in America over the past 65 years. This one supports the idea that consumers are spend-happy idiots, and that once it was easy to find a bankruptcy lawyer and file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, completely wiping away debt, people went hog wild with the charge cards.

Thumbnail image for Legal Ad. Reform Act.jpg

This chart tells the other story, the one that says credit card companies are predatory profit machines, and that once they had a way to charge sky-high interest rates they went hog wild with that, plowing poor, unknowing Americans under higher and higher piles of ultimately-unpayable debt.

Marq. v. Omaha.jpg

Vyse turns to Canada to make sense of it all:

Since the sharp upturn in bankruptcies corresponds with the vertical lines in both graphs, we might be tempted to simply choose the story we like best and be done with it. But what if both versions are false? And if so, how could we figure it out?

As it turns out, the answer is rather simple. A few studies have compared bankruptcy rates in Canada and the United States and found that the shapes of the two curves are remarkably similar. The Canadian bankruptcy rate turns upward in the late 1970s and, like the U.S. curve, rises at an increasing rate through the 1980s and 1990s. But neither of the events presumed to have created the epidemic in bankruptcies in the United States occurred in Canada. There was no change in the bankruptcy laws at that time that could explain the rise, and interest rates have been unregulated in Canada since 1886, making it possible for a lender to charge any rate the market will bear.

What’s really going on, then? Vyse stopped by the old Lehman Brother II Time & Life building earlier today. I’ll let him explain. (Thanks for the video help, Caitlin!)

For those of you working in cubicles without headphones, what he said was that the technology and innovation of modern life have created America’s Great Indebtedness. Advances in banking and telecommunications and transportation simply make it too easy to get to the stuff we want to buy. The instantaneousness of ATMs and drive-thru windows and Internet shopping and handing your credit card number out over the phone make a huge number of our buying decisions too quick for our own good. How many of you fell for the hyperlink to buy Vyse’s book on Amazon.com?

When we used to have time to think, we did. Alas, no more. Marketers and the proliferation of advertising have a role to play, sure, as do individuals who think they need to live in McMansions filled with stuff, but the very structure of society is the thing that lays the groundwork. All of which jibes with the fact that Americans aren’t the only ones who’ve been running up massive personal debt.

Vyse then has some ideas about what we can do, as individuals and as a country, to make things right. He’s a psychologist so a lot of it comes from behavioral finance — that glorious and oh-so-trendy intersection of economics and psychology. But I’ll leave that for him to cover in the book.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Associated Press

    Apple CEO Cook Gives Up $75M in Stock Dividends

    NEW YORK — Apple CEO Tim Cook is giving up $75 million in dividends on restricted stock that the company is awarding to all of its employees.

    In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, Apple Inc. said that Cook requested that his restricted stock units not receive dividends. The dividends that Apple workers are getting amount to $2.65 per quarter for each restricted stock unit held. The shares are not normally eligible to receive dividends, so Apple’s decision is a perk for its employees.

    The Bomb Hidden in Mitt Romney's Education PlanSlate

    Associated Press

    Study: Typical CEO Pay Up 6% to $9.6 Million

    NEW YORK — Profits at big U.S. companies broke records last year, and so did pay for CEOs.

    The head of a typical public company made $9.6 million in 2011, according to an analysis by The Associated Press using data from Equilar, an executive pay research firm.

  • Nathan W.

    Asking the consumer to voluntarily turn off the credit card is like asking a crack addict to voluntarily refuse a hit.

    I honestly think American’s have an ever increasing appetite for quick and pleasurable stimulus, and what can be more pleasurable, and deceivingly less dangerous, than excess consumption?

  • That Anonymous Dude

    Interestingly, he also benefits from this instant satisfication issue, as after reading this post, I went to Amazon and ordered his book.

    BTW: He needs to work on his amazon ranking..

    Searching for going broke yielded some interesting items…
    http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_/105-4745069-6834830?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=going+broke

  • odograph

    I recently read “Art of Money Getting” by P.T. Barnum, 1880 (it’s widely available on-line). It was amusing that it could be timely and at the same time dated in such a charming way. The book railed against credit and debt and what we’d call conspicuous consumption, or keeping up with the Jones. But rather than leasing BMWs, people would hire coaches they couldn’t afford to buy.

    So while I agree with Mr. Vyse that something has changed, I’m not sure that it is JUST the ease of purchase. It takes some time to set up a car-lease or home loan.

    No, I think the major difference has been the speed and ease with which we are granted credit.

    In Mr. Barnum’s day a shopkeeper knew and “trusted” a shopper for a suit. Only if the shopper failed to pay in a timely way would the shopkeeper demand a note, and the shopper would transition to debtor.

    Now we are pushed plastic in the mail, and it allows us to anonymously shop on credit, and to the shopkeeper appear indistinguishable from the monied buyer.

    People go into debt more secretly today, and without the burden of uncomfortable person-to-person interactions.

  • Corey

    Hmmm. I’m wondering if Dr. Vyse is writing outside of his area of expertise. A search on PsycInfo and EconLit doesn’t show him publishing research in the area of behavioral finance–his fields of study seem to be pseudoscience, superstition, and autism.

    On a behavioral level (& as a social psychologist), I’m disagreeing that it’s a function of the ease of acquisition. There has to be a motive to acquire. It may be a necessary condition, but a sufficient condition may be social comparison (i.e., keeping up with the Joneses).

  • Barbara Kiviat

    The Art of Money Getting — thanks, good tip. Though the other books that come up around it on Amazon.com are so much less colorful.

  • Liora

    Of course, Americans couldn’t run up unpayable debts if creditors were not willing to extend ever-increasing limits—and it doesn’t help that most credit is offered at exorbitant rates. But our passion for plastic is more than an addiction. It is the by-product of “motives” that are manufactured intentionally and with increasing urgency by our friends on Madison Avenue. Commercial enterprise has expanded our “needs,” creating a largely unattainable and unsustainable desire for material belongings and comfort that supersedes reason. We not only need to keep up with the Joneses these days, we have the unreality on our TV sets to compete with.

    But the motive cannot produce the debt alone. It has to be accompanied by acquisition, which depends on availability, both of the means and the goods.

    If you do “fall for” a hyperlink, this is a good one to follow. As a behaviorist and researcher, Vyse is right on the money on this topic. A three-paragraph (or three minute) interview cannot possibly represent an entire text, and this little entry does not do justice to the variety of subjects covered by the book. The range and poignancy of the personal stories which precede each chapter are worth the price alone, but the suggestions Vyse makes will save you far more than the book costs. Having taken a few of them myself, I would know.

  • Corinthia

    The assumptions above is that dept is caused by consumerism. But the number one cause of bankruptcy is medical cost — even in families with health insurance.

    Employeement numbers are good, but what they don’t show is when folks are laid off, yes they find new jobs — but the new jobs pay less, and have fewer benefits. Wages are stagnant – and the divide of classes is the greatest since the 1920′s. The middle class is shrinking. With stagnant wages, and no healthcare, a large percentage of Americans are one medical event from bankruptcy. This has nothing to do with consumerism.

    When my folks were young, lots of state colleges were tuition free, when I went to school it wasn’t too expensive — but todays kid is going to come out of an over crowded state college with 40,000 in loans. Pell grants, and other forms of college aid to low end students have dried up. Wages are not raising — lots of entry jobs don’t have benefits, just how is the next generation of Americans going to remain dept free?

  • Stuart Vyse

    The commenters are correct in pointing out that no single factor can explain the American epidemic of indebtedness, though my brief interview may mistakenly give that impression. Without question, decreasing wages and job security have made it much more difficult for many workers to maintain a stable income, and the absence of adequate health insurance leaves millions of Americans vulnerable to expenses they will be unable to meet. These issues have been very effectively outlined by Jacob Hacker (“The Great Risk Shift”), Elizabeth Warren (“The Two Income Trap” [with Amelia Warren Tyagi]), and others. I discuss this in the book, and my primary policy recommendation is to increase the economic security of workers by raising wages and providing universal health care.

    But unexpected medical bills or medical disability only lead to bankruptcy if the individual has inadequate savings. Typically the people who file for bankruptcy have little or no savings and lots of debt, and the majority of debt that is discharged in bankruptcy is consumer debt: credit cards and other kinds of consumer loans. Medical problems are high on the list of potential shocks to the family economy, along with unemployment and divorce, but it is an oversimplification to say this is the primary source of bankruptcy.

    Another look at the Canadian data helps make this point. Both countries have experienced skyrocketing bankruptcies in the last thirty years, but during that entire period, Canada had universal health care. The level of bankruptcies is somewhat lower in Canada than in the US, which may very well be the contribution of their superior health insurance system, but the dramatic increase in financial failure in both countries must be caused by something else.

    What has changed in the last thirty years is the role of credit cards in our lives, the marketplace’s invasion of our every waking moment, the aforementioned economic problems, and the emergence of a consumer-driven economy. Savings is actively discouraged by low interest rates, and buying to keep the economy afloat is considered patriotic. For example, the recently signed economic stimulus package will give money to lower-income families–not really for their own benefit, but in the hope they will go out and spend to shore up the stock market and the sagging portfolios of the wealthy. The tax rebate is really an indirect gift to investors, and if they are wise, most rebate recipients will hold on to the money or use it to pay down debt.

    It is also true that getting a college education has become very costly, and many young people emerge from college burdened with huge debts that hold them back just when they are starting their careers. Furthermore, student loan debt is not dischargeable through bankruptcy. I am glad to see that the problem of student loan debt is beginning to get some attention, and many institutions (my own included) have begun to reduce or eliminate student debt from financial aid packages. This is a positive trend that needs to be encouraged.

    Finally, social comparison–“keeping up with the Joneses”–is also an important factor, but I prefer not to blame the victim. We live in a much more highly branded world than ever before, and new technologies have both increased the role of advertising in our lives and created a long list of new necessities (e.g., computers, cell phones). I outline these new sources of consumer motivation in a chapter entitled “New Ways of Wanting.”

    In “Going Broke” I point to several factors that have led to our great indebtedness, and an important part of the picture is a debt-driven economy that makes impulsive consumption far too easy. When bankers give us more credit than we can reasonably handle, and spending is encouraged in myriad ways, it is no wonder we have arrived at this point. We could simply look down our noses at the person who gets into trouble, but while millions are living with the anxiety of bills they cannot pay, fortunes are being made in the banking and retail industries. Our economy is seriously out of balance, and we need to reconsider who is being served by this world of consumption.

    To continue the discussion of these and related issues, I encourage you to visit my blog at http://thesvblog.blogspot.com/ .

blog comments powered by Disqus