What regulators are good for: Cleaning up

Hedge fund manager and poker ace David Einhorn was the speaker at the 17th annual Graham & Dodd breakfast Friday morning. I arrived too late to get a seat, and left early because I was starving, but I did write down this quote:

Regulators are good at cleaning up fraud after the money is gone. Government doesn’t really know what to do when it catches fraud in progress.

Einhorn was talking mainly about his long-running battle with investment firm Allied Capital over its accounting practices. He’s got a book about the saga coming out next year, and if the excerpt he read at the breakfast–about a grilling he underwent at the hands of two SEC lawyers–was any indication, it should be pretty entertaining.

But the lesson is a broader one: It is incredibly hard for government officials to step in and try to stop behavior that they think is illegal or unwise at companies that seem to be making lots of money off this behavior. It’s even harder if it’s an entire industry, such as, say, the subprime mortgage lenders of a couple years ago. Try to crack down while the party is still going and you’re likely to get hauled in front of Congressional committees, lambasted in the media and attacked by aggressive company lawyers. Wait until it all falls apart and, while you’ll still get lambasted a bit, most of the discussions in the media and Congress will be about how to give you more resources and power in the future.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    David Paul Morris / Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Working the Room at Facebook’s Times Square Party

    Hey! Where is everyone?

    I headed to Nasdaq headquarters in Times Square, ground zero of the biggest high tech stock offering ever, where Facebook would be welcomed into the arms of the investing public. And all I found was a bunch of CNBC cameras.

    Why Greece Isn't Leaving the Eurozone YetSlate

    Getty Images

    The Creepy Dudes of Wall Street: Are Finance Guys Losing Their Mojo on the Dating Scene, Too?

    It’s tough to tell when an internet phenomenon reaches actual meme status. But, in the case of the “creepy finance guy,” I think we can finally call it.

    This week saw yet another jaw-dropping tale of Wall Street prattishness, this time in the form of a post-date survey. Yep, a finance dude went on a date with a lady. And then he asked her for constructive feedback.

  • p_lukasiak

    Jay, you don’t seem to be considering the question of who is running the guvernment at the time that irregularities are first discovered. For 18 of the last 26 years, the people in charge have been obsessed with “less government regulation” — often putting people who are philosophically opposed to regulation in charge of agencies that are supposed to regulate.

    In other words, is it really “government” that is ineffective… or “Republican government” that aren’t into regulating in the first place?

  • Justin Fox

    Clearly that’s part of it: If you don’t believe in regulation, you’re unlikely to be very good at it. But I don’t think it’s the whole story.

  • http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2009/01/05/are-regulators-ever-going-to-be-good-at-stopping-fraud/ The Curious Capitalist – TIME.com » Blog Archive Are regulators ever going to be good at stopping fraud? «

    [...] preferred the much shorter diagnosis that Einhorn made in a speech in 2007: Regulators are good at cleaning up fraud after the money is gone. Government doesn’t really know [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus