Which would be worse for Dow Jones: Murdoch, Burkle or Pearson?

So Pearson, which owns the Financial Times and part of the Economist, is talking to GE, owner of CNBC, about putting in a bid for Dow Jones. And now Ron Burkle is apparently contemplating on a bid, too.

Which puts the much-discussed dangers posed by Rupert Murdoch’s bid for Dow Jones in perspective. Yes, Murdoch has repeatedly toadied to China and interfered with editorial decisions at his papers. But you’ve got to worry that a Pearson-Dow Jones combination might eventually result in the demise of either the Journal or the FT. And Burkle, best known for union-friendly supermarket takeovers and a Page-Six-unfriendly sting operation, is almost a complete cipher, with no record running media properties. Given his Democratic Party ties, he’d certainly be sorely tempted to mess with the independence of the Journal‘s editorial pages, if not its news pages. But beyond that, who knows what he’d do?

Murdoch, by contrast, is a lifelong newspaperman who clearly wants to strengthen and expand the Journal–but might do it in a way that will drive some current fans of the paper crazy. Which, in comparison with the other alternatives making themselves apparent over the past few days, doesn’t sound all that horrible, does it?

Spain’s Prime Minister Warns Country Is in Danger of Being Shut Out of Markets

MADRID — Spain‘s prime minister warned Wednesday that the country faced the danger of being locked out of international markets as investors continued to fret about the future of the euro and Greece’s place in the 17-country eurozone.

“Right now there is a serious risk that (investors) will not lend us money or they will do so at an astronomical rate,” Mariano Rajoy told Spanish lawmakers.

p_lukasiak

“Given his Democratic Party ties, he’d certainly be sorely tempted to mess with the independence of the Journal’s editorial pages, if not its news pages.”

A newspaper’s ownership should be able to “interfere” with its editorial pages — and I think it would be a really interesting idea to do a complete makeover of the WSJ op-eds — even under Murdoch — because the only purpose they serve at this point is providing reliable source of fodder for snarky progressive bloggers on slow news days.

Do keep us posted on the possibility of Burkle purchasing the Journal. I’ve found a company that sells smelling salts whose stock is already taking off with all the swooning going on at the mere possibility of someone with (HORRORS!!!) “Democratic ties” taking over…
Justin Fox

Yeah, I could have phrased that better. The issue with Burkle isn’t his politics. It’s that his demonstrated skill set is buying and selling supermarkets, which doesn’t appear to have a whole lot to do with running media companies (or smelling salts manufacturers).
Peter Varhol

I’ve subscribed to the Wall Street Journal for over 12 years, and I confess that I’ve almost never read the op-ed pages. I don’t pay attention to the politics of the owner of a newspaper. However, what makes the Journal a premier newspaper is the range and depth of stories that tie into business in unexpected ways. In every issue of the Journal, I manage to say “I never knew that” at least once. If that changed, I would drop the subscription.