Beckham: Not washed-up just yet

With David Beckham’s hugely expensive arrival in Los Angeles coming ever closer, it might be worth revisiting just what he’s been doing back in Madrid. From Richard Williams’ blog at Guardian.co.uk:

Last January 13, two days after he announced that he would be moving to Los Angeles next season, Fabio Capello said the Englishman would never play for Real Madrid again. Less than a month later, however, Beckham forced his way back into the team and made such an impact that he has stayed there, when not injured or suspended, ever since. Six weeks out with a damaged knee ligament, caused when he fell into an advertising board after crossing the ball at speed, were ended on April 21 when he came off the bench to set up a winner against Valencia, and his presence since then has helped the team to mount the most improbable of late challenges.

As he shuttled between the centre-right of midfield and the right wing in Huelva on Sunday, his perceptive passing and wickedly curling crosses were at the heart of Madrid’s success. He made the opening goal for Robinho, and several other first-half chances were spurned. In the last minute, however, with the score at 2-2 and Madrid needing to win to keep the destiny of the title in their own hands, his energy took him into a position from which he could nudge Gonzalo Higuaín’s pass on to Fernando Gago and then watch as Roberto Carlos shot home from the decisive pass.

Williams is making the case that Beckham deserves his old spot back on England’s national team. And what’s the relevance for a blog called the Curious Capitalist? Well, he is supposed to make $250 million in LA. That’s capitalism, no?

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Associated Press

    Facebook Insiders Are Cashing Out Their Stakes Before IPO

    NEW YORK (AP) — Insiders and early Facebook investors are taking advantage of increasing investor demand and selling more of their stock in the company’s initial public offering, the company said Wednesday.

    Facebook said in a regulatory filing that 84 million shares, worth up to $3.2 billion, are being added to what’s shaping up to be the decade’s hottest IPO.

    America’s War on TouristsSlate

    David Paul Morris / Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Facebook IPO: What You Need To Know Now

    [The article was updated at 12:20 pm on 5/16/12.]

    Prom night is almost here for Facebook and its suitors. Here’s a program to the biggest high technology initial public offering ever, and what you should know:

  • p_lukasiak

    “Well, he is supposed to make $250 million in LA. That’s capitalism, no?”

    um, no. The idea that the “supply” of David Beckham is worth $250 million given the “demand” in the US “market” for soccer is a parody of capitalism. It other words, its probably the best example of the absurdity of “supply side economics” possible.

  • Justin Fox

    Actually it is capitalism. Beckham’s base salary is something like $5 million a year for five years. (A mere pittance, wouldn’t you say?) There’s another $25 million or so, total, in potential incentive pay. The rest is all his (extremely optimistically) projected take of merchandise and gate receipts. So he only gets all that crazy money if the “demand” materializes.

  • Anonymous

    maybe they should bring back scholes as well?

  • Justin Fox

    In case any readers here for the Peter Bernstein book party are confused, anonymous is talking about Paul Scholes, not Myron.

  • p_lukasiak

    “The rest is all his (extremely optimistically) projected take of merchandise and gate receipts. ”

    like I said, supply side economics.

    But for a US soccer team, even $5 million a year in salary is way out of line. Its only slightly less than what Peyton Manning gets (if one divides his $34.5 million signing bonus by seven years of the contract, and adds his meager 2005 salary of 635K to it.) And he’s the QB for a Superbowl winning team.

    The only way that Beckham is worth $250MM is if Daniel Craig drops dead, and he’s chosen as the next James Bond — and brings something to the role.

  • Justin Fox

    Watch it, Lukasiak. This kind of hateful, anti-soccer commentary could get you in trouble;-)

  • http://www.swagger.com swagger

    Anyone who have insulted and disregarded the ex-captain of england international soccer team , conclusively, and theoretically has , basically , no and little passion and enthuisiasm with soccer , and sequentially have no comprehensible understanding about the inspiration and unbelievable passing ability of the handsome and fashionable guy .

    He’s just the guy who hauls the circumstance,changing the scoreboard ,winning with exclamation and unparalleled renervation.

    Referring to the transfer to los angels ,the plausible and appropriate explanation would be , depending on the prospect and potentially career alteration, who knows if one day the attrative beckham would become another Leonardo Wilhelm DiCaprio wishfully , nevertheless , he’s much younger and energetic compared with Tom cruise.

blog comments powered by Disqus