The house that Meg Whitman built

By Justin Fox | March 30, 2007 | +

I’m on the Princeton campus, where I spoke earlier this afternoon on a panel on careers in the publishing industry (there will still be careers in the publishing industry, right?) and visited a guy named Krugman. The big excitement, though, was seeing what use Meg Whitman’s $30 million has been put to.

The money went toward building the massive, pseudogothic “Whitman College” where Princeton’s tennis courts used to be. It appears to be almost done. Here’s a mere corner of it:

Update: Here’s another view (and sorry, these are taken with my crummy camera phone; I’ll try to do better in the future):

Related Topics: Economy & Policy

@TIMEBusiness

Latest on Business

Facebook May 16, 2012

Facebook Insiders Are Cashing Out Their Stakes Before IPO

NEW YORK (AP) — Insiders and early Facebook investors are taking advantage of increasing investor demand and selling more of their stock in the company’s initial public offering, the company said Wednesday.

Facebook said in a regulatory filing that 84 million shares, worth up to $3.2 billion, are being added to what’s shaping up to be the decade’s hottest IPO.
From our Partners
America’s War on TouristsSlate

War of the Roses: Mother's Day Bouquet Is an Economic and Political BattlefieldDaily Finance
Half Of Recent College Graduates Lack Full-Time Job, Study SaysHuff Post Business
Facebook May 16, 2012

Facebook IPO: What You Need To Know Now

[The article was updated at 12:20 pm on 5/16/12.]

Prom night is almost here for Facebook and its suitors. Here’s a program to the biggest high technology initial public offering ever, and what you should know:

Peter Varhol

I’m sorry, Justin. There won’t be careers in publishing, at least not how they have been defined in the past. Technology publishing, which is where I hang my hat at the moment, is gasping its last. Business publishing will follow, and general interest publishing will bring up the rear. Certainly there is an ongoing need for content, but competition from many sources has made it increasingly difficult to value traditional content.

I just spent a wonderful afternoon perusing Wikipedia, for example (I am a traitor to my vocation). If people produce high quality content for reasons other than direct renumeration, then publishing as a career may well be doomed. And in the case of Wikipedia, the discussions surrounding a given topic are almost as enjoyable as the topic itself.