Do publicly traded private equity firms = conglomerates?

I’m still trying to get my head around the news that, after years of badmouthing public equity markets, Steve Schwarzman is thinking of taking Blackstone Group public. It does nicely underscore the basic truth of the private equity business, which is that without public markets on which to buy and sell companies, it couldn’t exist.

When I think about what a publicly traded Blackstone would look like, though, my mind keeps drifting back to the 1960s, when conglomerates like ITT and LTV were the hottest thing in business. The conglomerateurs bought companies in lots of unrelated businesses on the assumption that they could somehow run them better than they had been run before.

It turned out, though, that the conglomerates’ chief assets had been their high stock prices, which allowed them to swallow up companies on the cheap. Once the stock market stopped cooperating, their reason for existence disappeared. In their place arose a new market phenomenon, the leveraged buyout (LBO) fund, which used borrowed money to take underperforming companies off the market and then performed radical surgery–often involving shedding unrelated businesses–before taking them public again.

You probably see where I’m headed here: The most successful LBO artists grew into today’s private equity firms, the biggest of which–like Blackstone–manage investments in dozens of companies at once. Sort of like, you know, a conglomerate. And with Blackstone mulling an IPO, the speculation is that several of its competitors may follow suit.

Now there are surely some important differences that I’m ignoring here. And there are conglomerates that work pretty well: Berkshire Hathaway thanks to the consistency and financial acumen of its CEO, Warren Buffett; and General Electric thanks to its relentless focus on developing top managers. Blackstone may turn out to have a differentiating skill set like that, too. But it’s just not possible that all the big private equity firms do. And if they go public, that will eventually become apparent to one and all, just as it did with the conglomerateurs of the 1960s.

Related Topics: Economy & Policy
  • Latest on Business

    Don Emmert / Getty Images

    Apple Now Worth More Than Microsoft, Google Combined

    How high can Apple soar? The tech juggernaut is closing in on $500 per share, a dramatic psychological threshold that underscores the company’s stunning performance over the last decade. How massive has Apple become? It’s now worth more by market capitalization than Google and Microsoft combined. The company’s latest stock price surge is being fueled by rumors that a new version of the iPad — the iPad 3 — will appear next month.

    Chipotle Is AppleSlate

    Photo-Illustration by Alexander Ho for TIME; Getty Images

    After Motorola Deal Approval, Can Google Hardware Be Far Behind?

    Now that federal regulators appear poised to approve Google’s $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility, speculation is mounting about what the Internet giant will do with its newly acquired assets. And what assets they are. Once the deal is formally approved — an announcement could come next week, according to multiple reports — Google will be in possession of some 17,000 patents related to mobile phone technology. And it will be well-situated to enter the hardware business, which could mean that consumers will soon see Google-branded phones and home entertainment devices.

  • wsh

    this so trite (please check a dictionary for definition) that must have been a true labour of love

  • John Locton

    “Now there are surely some important differences that I’m ignoring here” – I find this hard to believe, in fact I think you’ve nailed it.

    Blackstone will be just like any other conglomerate from the 1960′s; that is, assuming those conglomerates were constantly buying up other conglomerates and shedding off their non-core assets, all the while staffing the acquired businesses with the best and the brightest while placing significant (but prudent) leverage on the businesses…

  • Anonymous

    This comment probably won’t be approved but I just want you to know that all of us are aware that you stole this article from:

    http://equityprivate.typepad.com/ep/2006/08/imminent_death_.html

  • http://time-blog.com/curious_capitalist/index.html Justin Fox

    Ah, what is to be done with these lazy-ass commenters (I’m talking about the intrepid Anonymous) who can’t even be bothered to read the post after next?

    As for John Locton’s comment: Yeah, there’s something to that. But I think you’d have to be pretty optimistic (and maybe gullible) to believe that Blackstone will always be as smart and “prudent” in the future as it has been in the past.

  • http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/article1101541.ece mike

    And let’s not forget who “Going Private” stole her idea from …

    The Sunday Times, 2 November 2003, “Private-equity firms are new conglomerates”

    http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/article1101541.ece

  • http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2010/07/15/miscellaneous-organizational-links/ Miscellaneous Organizational Links « Organizations and Markets

    [...] KKR IPO was a snoozer. But what the heck is a publicly traded private-equity firm [...]

  • http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2010/07/16/miscellaneous-organizational-links/ Miscellaneous Organizational Links « Organizations and Markets

    [...] much-anticipated KKR IPO turned out to be a snoozer. But what the heck is a publicly traded private-equity firm [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus